It wasn't me that mentioned the hot seats, but did mention the analysis of the financials of the situation.BeatTheSkunk wrote: Tue Aug 19, 2025 4:10 pm2. I vaguely recall a post from last year, I am guessing that it was either from @DarkShadow or @camobass (apologies if I am mistaken on the correct identity, so feel free to set the record straight) but this person cautioned against lodging complaints about, what at the time was related to the rental boats being too hot and burning people from their raw metal surfaces and/or lack of seats, in addition to the "poor" condition of the road.
First, let me refer to a great quote that people need to understand a bit better:
Ding, ding, ding! We *may* think there are enough of us, simply because we are members of a fishing message board and we all share the same passion. Go ask your average San Diegoan (is that the correct term?) what Barrett Lake is. You'll get a good reality check there.JWall wrote: Tue Aug 19, 2025 9:17 pmIn the grand scheme of things, there are not enough of us to matter.
The City of San Diego funds places like Barrett based on ROI. But, simply because you think Barrett is a 'cash cow,' doesn't make it so.
The analogy I used in previous posts was that of the 2 siblings who get a monthly stipend to run a business. Parents give them each $100 a month.
Kid #1 runs a lemonade stand. At the end of the month, they have grossed $200, which means a $100 profit. Success! But, the parents need to drive the kid to get lemons and sugar, they have to provide the water, they have to help the kid set up the stand every day, they have to worry about Chester The Molester driving by, they have to give up their kitchen so the kid can squeeze the lemons and make a mess, sugar all over the counters.

Kid #2 invests in the stock market (using the T.A.C.O. investment strategy). At the end of the month, they have grossed $500. A $400 profit. Also success, without even having to get up. And all the parents had to do was feed and house the kid.
Now, if the parents are focused on profits over feelings, they can tell Kid #1 to kick rocks, and the $100 a month they used to spend on them, now goes to kid #2. Now instead of the $400 profit, it becomes $800.
And the City of San Diego is happy. And they don't have ants on the kitchen counter.
So, the moral of the story, reservoirs in SoCal are big 5 gallon water jugs. They were never meant for recreation and if the water districts would have their way, they'd kick every one out, much like MWD did at Lake Mathews. Why do you think SD lakes are not open every day?
I'm not saying to not sign a petition to grade the road, but just understand where Barrett Lake is at in the over all totem pole of San Diego fiscal priorities.