Rattus wrote: Wed Feb 07, 2024 3:38 pm
I have a very well-worn Clouser that looks similar to your top fly with the barbed hook. It lost so much bucktail I thought about throwing it out but the darn thing keeps catching fish, even better than when the fly was new and had a fuller profile!
What are some of the advantages/disadvantages of synthetics over bucktail (aside from cost)? Have you experimented with Squipmish Hair?
Used to be that bucktail had more motion or action than most synthetics and cost less. The tapered tips help with the motion and often move with the slightest motion of the fly or current. But synthetics were available in longer lengths. Many synthetics were more flexible over longer lengths too, with shorter lengths being more stiff. Craft fur was an exception. Craft fur can be chewed up like bucktail though.
Bucktail, with its natural taper, is stiffer towards the butt of the fibers and more flexible towards the tip. Most synthetics flex the same over their entire length, even the synthetics I have used with tapered tips. This may be important to some fly designs.
Some bucktail can be more brittle and less durable than others, but you get what you get when buy on line. If you buy in a store you can inspect before purchase but I have noticed that the quality of what is found in stores has gone down over the last decade or so. I don't know why.
Many synthetics are prone to knotting or tangling - I carry a fine tooth comb like those designed for eyebrows or mustaches to comb them out.
Today premium bucktails with good, straight, 5"+ hairs can be cost $13-$25 ( still have a few that I bought in 2000 for $5 that would retail for $20 today) with petite bucktails with good 3"-4" hair costing around 8".
Packages of synthetic materials run about $7 to $11 depending on the material and brand. But although they seem small, you don't generally need a lot of material per fly. I have packages of EP Fibers that I have tied more than 100 flies from and still have material left over.
These days I tend to use bucktail for flies with some bulk and a solid profile and use synthetics for sparse or larger flies. I sometimes mix both materials in some patterns - typically larger ones like I use for stripers where I want a broad and opaque body but need some length in the fly.
If you want broad and bulky looking flies it is often easier to achieve this type of pattern with less material using bucktail. An example of such a pattern is Bob Popovic's Hollow Fleye, which is easier to tie than something like Bisharat's Airhead.
I also choose synthetics for toothy critters.
I like my flies to last. I don't plan on loosing them, but it does happen. With largemouth bass and spotted bay bass usually get more than 25 fish per fly and have had many get more than 100 and handful more than 200 fish. They have gotten pretty sparse by that point. Those small sandpaper like teeth that bass have slowly grind away at the materials and finished head.
I have had some clouser minnows tied with bucktail still catching spotties and other bay species with just a few bucktail fibers and a few strands of flash remaining.
On the other hand, one barracuda or halibut can destroy fly if its teeth chew on the right spots. Synthetics are more likely to survive such encounters though the thread in the heads can be cut. I apply glue at most tie in points while constructing the fly and on the head before doing the finishing wraps, the coat the head after finishing the wraps to help make a more durable fly. I have had flies tied with all natural materials, including bucktail survive more than a dozen pike. They may have been shedding materials but still held enough to catch fish.
Calf tail is tougher than bucktail but most of the calf tails have hair that can only be used to tie flies up to 1.5" long. Every once in awhile I will find one that can tie longer flies.
Sparse flies often work better than more full bodied pattern, especially when the principle food source is small baitfish.
On the other hand, bulkier patterns push more water and create more of a disturbance that game fish detect via their lateral line and are often better in lowlight conditions or murky water when small bait isn't concentrated.
I haven't used Squipmish Hair but I have been given samples of other tapered synthetic hairs to mess with. It works fine but can tangle and knot like non-tapered synthetics. It's a good material. It is another type of hair used to create wigs. By the way, hair used to create wigs can be purchased in huge quantities for cheap compared to synthetic hair sold for fly tying, much of which is the same but perhaps treated with water repellents. Many custom fly tiers use wig hair.